<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Apps Law Blog &#187; MobileCrunch</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.appslawblog.com/tag/mobilecrunch/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.appslawblog.com</link>
	<description>iPhone, mobile, Facebook and other software apps, and the law.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 14:56:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Apple&#8217;s App Store continues to alienate</title>
		<link>http://www.appslawblog.com/apples-app-store-continues-to-alienate/</link>
		<comments>http://www.appslawblog.com/apples-app-store-continues-to-alienate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 19:58:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eric Seidmon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apps Store]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MobileCrunch]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.appslawblog.com/?p=844</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Less than a month ago, <a href="http://www.apple.com">Apple</a> removed more than 5,000 apps from its iPhone and iPod <a href="http://www.apple.com/iphone/apps-for-iphone/">App Sto</a><a href="http://www.apple.com/iphone/apps-for-iphone/">re</a>.  Apple&#8217;s reasoning: the apps included inappropriate content.</p>
<p>However, it seems that Apple was acting more in its interest than that of&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Less than a month ago, <a href="http://www.apple.com">Apple</a> removed more than 5,000 apps from its iPhone and iPod <a href="http://www.apple.com/iphone/apps-for-iphone/">App Sto</a><a href="http://www.apple.com/iphone/apps-for-iphone/">re</a>.  Apple&#8217;s reasoning: the apps included inappropriate content.</p>
<p>However, it seems that Apple was acting more in its interest than that of&hellip;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.appslawblog.com/apples-app-store-continues-to-alienate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced

Served from: www.appslawblog.com @ 2012-02-09 03:39:32 -->
