<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Apps Law Blog &#187; FCC</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.appslawblog.com/tag/fcc/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.appslawblog.com</link>
	<description>iPhone, mobile, Facebook and other software apps, and the law.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 14:56:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Rejected Apple Apps Publicized</title>
		<link>http://www.appslawblog.com/rejected-apple-apps-publicized/</link>
		<comments>http://www.appslawblog.com/rejected-apple-apps-publicized/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 00:04:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eric Seidmon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[App Rejections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[app store]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FCC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Voice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ReadWriteWeb]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.appslawblog.com/?p=432</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Although Apple's review process for iPhone apps seems to elude most developers, the App Rejections site should help app developers better understand why certain apps were rejected.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although Apple&#8217;s review process for iPhone apps seems to elude most developers, the App Rejections site should help app developers better understand why certain apps were rejected.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.appslawblog.com/rejected-apple-apps-publicized/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Broadband internet will become a right in Finland</title>
		<link>http://www.appslawblog.com/broadband-internet-will-become-a-right-in-finland/</link>
		<comments>http://www.appslawblog.com/broadband-internet-will-become-a-right-in-finland/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 18:15:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eric Seidmon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[broadband]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FCC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Finland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet access]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.appslawblog.com/?p=198</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Finland has declared broadband internet access a legal right while France seems to be cracking down on internet piracy.  What direction will the US likely head in?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Finland has declared broadband internet access a legal right while France seems to be cracking down on internet piracy.  What direction will the US likely head in?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.appslawblog.com/broadband-internet-will-become-a-right-in-finland/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google and AT&amp;T at odds over voice control</title>
		<link>http://www.appslawblog.com/google-and-att-at-odds-over-voice-control/</link>
		<comments>http://www.appslawblog.com/google-and-att-at-odds-over-voice-control/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 22:20:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eric Seidmon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[app store]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AT&T]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FCC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Voice]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.appslawblog.com/?p=174</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The FCC has been required to get involved with the ongoing dispute between Google and AT&#038;T.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The FCC has been required to get involved with the ongoing dispute between Google and AT&#038;T.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.appslawblog.com/google-and-att-at-odds-over-voice-control/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced

Served from: www.appslawblog.com @ 2012-02-05 22:02:54 -->
