<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Apps Law Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.appslawblog.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.appslawblog.com</link>
	<description>iPhone, mobile, Facebook and other software apps, and the law.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2010 23:10:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Facebook&#8217;s News Feed now protected by patent</title>
		<link>http://www.appslawblog.com/facebooks-news-feed-now-protected-by-patent/</link>
		<comments>http://www.appslawblog.com/facebooks-news-feed-now-protected-by-patent/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2010 23:10:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eric Seidmon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Information Week]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LinkedIn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MySpace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News Feed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPTO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.appslawblog.com/?p=816</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The <a href="http://www.uspto.gov">U.S. Patent Office</a> recently awarded <a href="http://www.facebook.com">Fa</a><a href="http://www.facebook.com">cebook</a> a patent for its News Feed feature.  The patent, applied for in 2006, covers 25 claims. <a href="http://www.facebook.com"><img class="alignright" src="http://www.seattlerunningcompany.com/art/FaceBookF.png" alt="" width="154" height="154" /></a></p>
<p>The News Feed is an integral part of social networking, which shares news update&#8230;</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The <a href="http://www.uspto.gov">U.S. Patent Office</a> recently awarded <a href="http://www.facebook.com">Fa</a><a href="http://www.facebook.com">cebook</a> a patent for its News Feed feature.  The patent, applied for in 2006, covers 25 claims. <a href="http://www.facebook.com"><img class="alignright" src="http://www.seattlerunningcompany.com/art/FaceBookF.png" alt="" width="154" height="154" /></a></p>
<p>The News Feed is an integral part of social networking, which shares news update about friends. <a href="http://www.informationweek.com/news/storage/data_protection/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=223100843">Inform</a><a href="http://www.informationweek.com/news/storage/data_protection/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=223100843">ation </a><a href="http://www.informationweek.com/news/storage/data_protection/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=223100843">Week reports</a> the description of the patent: &#8220;The method includes generating news items regarding activities associated with a user of a social network environment and attaching an informational link associated with at least one of the activities, to at least one of the news items.&#8221;</p>
<p>The patent also covers a process for limiting access and assigning an order to the new items.</p>
<p>As of now, Facebook has not made a public announcement regarding its plans for the patent.  Ownership of the update process could adversely affect social networking sites like <a href="http://www.linkedin.com">LinkedIn</a> or <a href="http://www.myspace.com">MySpace</a>, the latter having lost much of its market to Facebook.</p>
Similar Posts:<ul><li>None Found</li></ul>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.appslawblog.com/facebooks-news-feed-now-protected-by-patent/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Facebook&#8217;s Beacon settlement causing new problems</title>
		<link>http://www.appslawblog.com/facebooks-beacon-settlement-causing-new-problems/</link>
		<comments>http://www.appslawblog.com/facebooks-beacon-settlement-causing-new-problems/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2010 02:05:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eric Seidmon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Beacon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chris Hoofnagle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EPIC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ginger McCall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Richard Seeborg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Larry Magid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scott Kamber]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tim Sparapani]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.appslawblog.com/?p=798</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.appslawblog.com/wp-content/uploads/lawsuit_250x251.jpg"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-812" title="lawsuit_250x251" src="http://www.appslawblog.com/wp-content/uploads/lawsuit_250x251.jpg" alt="" width="148" height="129" /></a>According to a report by <a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/news/Facebook-Privacy-Settlement-law-2382535408.html?x=0&#038;.v=1">Yahoo</a>, the plaintiff attorneys in the class action <a href="http://www.facebook.com">Facebook</a> privacy <a href="http://pdfserver.amlaw.com/ca/motion_for_approval.pdf">settlement</a> over the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Facebook_Beacon">Beacon advertising program </a>are &#8220;trying to fend off critics by suggesting&#8230;that privacy organizations are raising objections because they&#8230;</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.appslawblog.com/wp-content/uploads/lawsuit_250x251.jpg"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-812" title="lawsuit_250x251" src="http://www.appslawblog.com/wp-content/uploads/lawsuit_250x251.jpg" alt="" width="148" height="129" /></a>According to a report by <a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/news/Facebook-Privacy-Settlement-law-2382535408.html?x=0&#038;.v=1">Yahoo</a>, the plaintiff attorneys in the class action <a href="http://www.facebook.com">Facebook</a> privacy <a href="http://pdfserver.amlaw.com/ca/motion_for_approval.pdf">settlement</a> over the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Facebook_Beacon">Beacon advertising program </a>are &#8220;trying to fend off critics by suggesting&#8230;that privacy organizations are raising objections because they didn&#8217;t get a piece of the action.&#8221;</p>
<p>In September 2009, Facebook reached a settlement regarding its Beacon advertising program. To learn more, check out our earlier post on <a href="http://www.appslawblog.com/lawsuit-facebook-beacon-complicate/">appslawblog.com</a>.</p>
<p>In the settlement, Facebook agreed to stop the program and give $9.5 million to a new organization to study online privacy. This was a big turnaround for Facebook after the Beacon debacle. </p>
<p>Like the case&#8217;s settlement process, the agreement has hit a bit of a snag.  Numerous privacy groups have sent a letter to U.S. District Court Judge Richard Seeborg in the Northern District of California. The groups say they are concerned that the organization Facebook is paying will not be independent. The groups prefer the money be used to fund existing nonprofits serving the same purpose.</p>
<p>An <a href="http://pdfserver.amlaw.com/ca/objection.pdf">official objection to the class action settlement</a> has already been filed. <a href="http://epic.org/">EPIC</a> attorney Ginger McCall claims the settlement would not provide class members with relief aside from Facebook&#8217;s promise to disband the Beacon advertising program, which it voluntarily shut down a while ago. Furthermore, the organization that Facebook would be paying is neither independent nor needed. </p>
<p>There is also an issue with attorneys&#8217; fees for the plaintiffs; one attorney mentioned is Scott Kamber. Multiple parties have complained that the fees are egregious.</p>
<p>The fee issues were to be addressed on Feb. 26, 2010, by Judge Seeborg in Kamber&#8217;s motion to approve the settlement. </p>
<p>There are clearly internal questions among the lawyers and parties involved over who should control the settlement fund, an important question to that needs to be resolved.</p>
<p>Should EPIC be in control? What about the new privacy organization Facebook would like to give the money to?  </p>
<p><a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/news/Facebook-Privacy-Settlement-law-2382535408.html?x=0&#038;.v=1">Yahoo</a> reports that the organization would have three directors: Larry Magid, an Internet safety advocate; Chris Hoofnagle, an University of California at Berkeley law professor; and Facebook executive Tim Sparapani. Kamber and Rhodes would be on the legal advisory board.</p>
<p>The organization will supposedly become a &#8220;public relations organization for Facebook&#8221; and will not protect Internet users.</p>
<p>There certainly appear to be conflicts of interest, depending uponwhomo receives control over the settlement funds.</p>
Similar Posts:<ul><li>None Found</li></ul>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.appslawblog.com/facebooks-beacon-settlement-causing-new-problems/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The buzz surrounding Google Buzz</title>
		<link>http://www.appslawblog.com/the-buzz-surrounding-google-buzz/</link>
		<comments>http://www.appslawblog.com/the-buzz-surrounding-google-buzz/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 03:33:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eric Seidmon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AOL Instant Messenger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Buzz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cnn.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flickr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gmail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Buzz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Wave]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile devices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Picasa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.appslawblog.com/?p=777</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.google.com">Google</a> recently<a href="http://www.google.com/buzz"><img class="alignright" src="http://www.google.com/s2/static/images/1444417344-GoogleBuzzLogo68.png" alt="" width="286" height="68" /></a> entered the social networking universe, unveiling <a href="http://www.google.com/buzz">Google Buzz</a> on Feb. 9, 2010. The network runs through Google&#8217;s popular <a href="https://www.google.com/accounts/ServiceLogin?service=mail&#38;passive=true&#38;rm=false&#38;continue=http%3A%2F%2Fmail.google.com%2Fmail%2F%3Fui%3Dhtml%26zy%3Dl&#38;bsv=zpwhtygjntrz&#38;scc=1&#38;ltmpl=default&#38;ltmplcache=2">Gmail</a> service and allows users to update their status akin to <a href="http://www.facebook.com">Facebook</a> or <a href="http://twitter.com">Twitter</a>, post&#8230;</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.google.com">Google</a> recently<a href="http://www.google.com/buzz"><img class="alignright" src="http://www.google.com/s2/static/images/1444417344-GoogleBuzzLogo68.png" alt="" width="286" height="68" /></a> entered the social networking universe, unveiling <a href="http://www.google.com/buzz">Google Buzz</a> on Feb. 9, 2010. The network runs through Google&#8217;s popular <a href="https://www.google.com/accounts/ServiceLogin?service=mail&amp;passive=true&amp;rm=false&amp;continue=http%3A%2F%2Fmail.google.com%2Fmail%2F%3Fui%3Dhtml%26zy%3Dl&amp;bsv=zpwhtygjntrz&amp;scc=1&amp;ltmpl=default&amp;ltmplcache=2">Gmail</a> service and allows users to update their status akin to <a href="http://www.facebook.com">Facebook</a> or <a href="http://twitter.com">Twitter</a>, post photos and link to members of their network. Comments on posts appear in real time and comments by other users will  be weighted similar to how Google&#8217;s search engine weighs results.</p>
<p>But why sign up for yet another social networking site?  Well, Google Buzz is different. It serves as a way to meld social networks in an all-in-one location, pulling the user&#8217;s activity from sites such as Twitter, <a href="http://www.flickr.com/">Flickr</a>, and <a href="http://picasa.google.com/">Picasa</a>.  Buzz is partly designed to mimic Twitter&#8217;s micro-blogging structure. The service also features features  privacy settings like those on Facebook, making user content available only to friends, for example.</p>
<p>Google says Buzz will also be available to mobile devices, including the  iPhone.  Features will include voice-recognition posting and a  GPS-enabled ability to attach the user&#8217;s location to posts.  Other  expansions will likely include enabling  users to post to Twitter accounts through a Buzz tool.</p>
<p>According to <a href="http://www.cnn.com/2010/TECH/02/09/google.social/index.html?hpt=C1">CNN.com</a>, it appears that Google would also like to displace <a href="http://products.aim.com/">AOL Instant Messenger</a> from its hold as the leading instant messaging service now that the Gchat (aka <a href="http://www.google.com/talk/">Google Talk</a>) feature on Gmail has attracted so many users.  Buzz plans to target those users is by offering the Buzz feature to companies as a tool for interoffice communication.  Google thinks their new program could globally businesses communication.</p>
<p>Google claims the new products are a respond to users&#8217; interests. The company is taking a new approach by socializing the Web, meaning that searches will be as social as the Web itself according to Google&#8217;s instructional online video.  However, there will be limitations;  Facebook users whose profiles are private will not be viewable via Buzz.</p>
<p>It will be interesting to see how <a href="http://wave.google.com/help/wave/closed.html">Google Wave</a> will be integrated into all of this.  Keep a lookout for Google making news headlines as it continues its ambitious ways.</p>
Similar Posts:<ul><li>None Found</li></ul>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.appslawblog.com/the-buzz-surrounding-google-buzz/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Some iPhone apps may require FDA regulation</title>
		<link>http://www.appslawblog.com/some-iphone-apps-may-require-fda-regulation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.appslawblog.com/some-iphone-apps-may-require-fda-regulation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 05:57:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eric Seidmon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Center for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FDA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[healthcare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medical device]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medical purposes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mHealth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobihealthnews]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.appslawblog.com/?p=755</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/default.htm"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-770" title="iphone-stethoscope-trimmed-150" src="http://www.appslawblog.com/wp-content/uploads/iphone-stethoscope-trimmed-150.jpg" alt="iphone-stethoscope-trimmed-150" width="150" height="182" /></a>As more <a href="http://www.apple.com/iphone/">iPhone</a> apps are released for medical purposes such as diagnosis and treatment of symptoms, Electronic Medical Records (EMR), and other health-related purposes, <a href="www.apple.com">Apple</a>&#8217;s mobile device is garnering more attention from the <a href="http://www.fda.gov/">FDA</a>.</p>
<p>Don Witters of the <a&#8230;</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/default.htm"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-770" title="iphone-stethoscope-trimmed-150" src="http://www.appslawblog.com/wp-content/uploads/iphone-stethoscope-trimmed-150.jpg" alt="iphone-stethoscope-trimmed-150" width="150" height="182" /></a>As more <a href="http://www.apple.com/iphone/">iPhone</a> apps are released for medical purposes such as diagnosis and treatment of symptoms, Electronic Medical Records (EMR), and other health-related purposes, <a href="www.apple.com">Apple</a>&#8217;s mobile device is garnering more attention from the <a href="http://www.fda.gov/">FDA</a>.</p>
<p>Don Witters of the <a href="http://www.fda.gov/AboutFDA/CentersOffices/CDRH/default.htm">FDA Center for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH)</a> said the agency&#8217;s goal is to achieve safe, secure, and reliable deployments of wireless technology in health care.  As a result, the FDA more interested in the iPhone use by licensed medical professionals.  <a href="http://mobihealthnews.com/474/fda-may-regulate-iphone-health-apps/">Mobihealthnews.com</a> reports that Witters has defined a medical device as:</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><em>“&#8230;an implementation, product, apparatus or other component or accessory, which is used in the diagnosis, cure, mitigation, treatment, prevention of disease or effects any structure of the body–that could actually include some information technologies and performance technologies–but usually something that is performed on the patient, touches the patient or is performed between physician and patient.”</em></p>
<p>Can an iPhone achieve many or all of these uses and purposes?  Yes. It appears that an iPhone loaded with the proper apps is indeed a medical device of some sort.</p>
<p>If that&#8217;s the case, how should the FDA get involved in regulating the device? Witters said the FDA&#8217;s role is &#8220;to provide some reasonable assurance of safety and effectiveness in medical devices marketed in the U.S.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.mobih.org/">mHealth</a> apps developers as well as wireless medical device makers should contact the FDA to provide their views about how this emerging industry should be regulated.  For questions on this subject, or to provide an opinion, <a href="http://www.fda.gov/AboutFDA/CentersOffices/CDRH/ucm142611.htm">contact the FDA&#8217;s CDRH</a>.  As regulations and roles are defined and categorized, so too will laws emerge regarding mobile devices and their medical use.</p>
Similar Posts:<ul><li>None Found</li></ul>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.appslawblog.com/some-iphone-apps-may-require-fda-regulation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>iPhone app developers can&#8217;t utilize GPS for advertising</title>
		<link>http://www.appslawblog.com/iphone-app-developers-cant-utilize-gps-for-advertising/</link>
		<comments>http://www.appslawblog.com/iphone-app-developers-cant-utilize-gps-for-advertising/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 19:32:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eric Seidmon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Admob]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apps Store]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Core Location framework]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone Dev Center]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quattro Wireless]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.appslawblog.com/?p=743</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Apple has announced that the GPS feature in <a href="http://www.apple.com/iphone/">iPhone 3G and iPhone 3GS </a>may be accessed only to provide what the company describes as &#8220;beneficial information.&#8221;  The restriction means no advertising using Apple&#8217;s Core Location framework.</p>
<div class="mceTemp">
<dl</div><p>&#8230;</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apple has announced that the GPS feature in <a href="http://www.apple.com/iphone/">iPhone 3G and iPhone 3GS </a>may be accessed only to provide what the company describes as &#8220;beneficial information.&#8221;  The restriction means no advertising using Apple&#8217;s Core Location framework.</p>
<div class="mceTemp">
<dl id="attachment_748" class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 179px;">
<dt class="wp-caption-dt"><img class="size-full wp-image-748" title="3199474458_6f9061cbe8" src="http://www.appslawblog.com/wp-content/uploads/3199474458_6f9061cbe8.jpg" alt="3199474458_6f9061cbe8" width="169" height="180" /></dt>
<dd class="wp-caption-dd"></dd>
</dl>
</div>
<p><a href="http://www.apple.com/">Apple</a>&#8217;s <a href="http://developer.apple.com/iphone/news/archives/2010/february/#corelocation">iPhone Dev Center</a> describes the framework as a tool that &#8220;allows you to build applications which know where your users are and can deliver information based on their location, such as local weather, nearby restaurants, ATMs and other location-based information.&#8221;</p>
<p>Apple&#8217;s App Store Review Team will not post the app to Apple&#8217;s store if the software enables a mobile advertiser to target messages based on an iPhone user&#8217;s location. The reviewers will return the app to the developers for modification.</p>
<p>It appears that Apple placed limits on outside developers to avoid competition with its internal strategy to infiltrate the mobile advertising market. Apple has not announced its advertising plans yet, and thus it is hard to know the company&#8217;s plans.</p>
<p>But recent developments suggest that the strategy exists and will soon be made public. On Jan. 5, Apple purchased the mobile advertising firm <a href="http://www.quattrowireless.com/">Quattro Wireless</a> . That gave rise to speculation that Apple would allow app developers to use Quattro to integrate the company&#8217;s advertising plans into Apps Store software.</p>
<p>There is also speculation that Apple wants to retain control over location-aware advertising in order to gain an edge over competitors such as <a href="http://www.admob.com/">Admob</a>,which Google purchased.  Apple now has patents on location-based services, so Apple may be girding for a mobile-ad fight with its sometime-ally, sometime nemesis.</p>
Similar Posts:<ul><li>None Found</li></ul>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.appslawblog.com/iphone-app-developers-cant-utilize-gps-for-advertising/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>iFart Mobile Creator Introduces My App Creator!</title>
		<link>http://www.appslawblog.com/ifart-mobile-creator-introduces-my-app-creator/</link>
		<comments>http://www.appslawblog.com/ifart-mobile-creator-introduces-my-app-creator/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 01:25:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joel Rothman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.appslawblog.com/?p=739</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignright" title="InfomediaInc" src="https://store.infomediainc.com/skin/frontend/blank/theme053/images/logo.png" alt="" width="327" height="80" />Our client <a href="http://www.infomediainc.com" target="_blank">Infomedia</a> has introduced <a href="http://www.myappcreator.com?a_aid=rothmanjb&#38;amp;a_bid=a5c2f849" target="_blank">My App Creator</a>, a complete turnkey system that anyone can use to create their own iPhone app and have it placed before tens of millions of iPhone and iPod Touch owners&#8230;</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignright" title="InfomediaInc" src="https://store.infomediainc.com/skin/frontend/blank/theme053/images/logo.png" alt="" width="327" height="80" />Our client <a href="http://www.infomediainc.com" target="_blank">Infomedia</a> has introduced <a href="http://www.myappcreator.com?a_aid=rothmanjb&amp;amp;a_bid=a5c2f849" target="_blank">My App Creator</a>, a complete turnkey system that anyone can use to create their own iPhone app and have it placed before tens of millions of iPhone and iPod Touch owners in the Apple iTunes AppStore!</p>
<p>If you are an author, speaker, entertainer, musician, athlete, business or anyone else that could use a presence in the AppStore, this is the solution you have been waiting for!  Imagine being able to create your own app populated with your blog, twitter feed, audios &amp; videos, calendar or events and more content.</p>
<p>Choose from one of My App Creator&#8217;s standard templates or apply your own custom design to your app.   Once complete, the App gets uploaded to the iTunes AppStore for you. You don&#8217;t even need to apply or pay for an iPhone developer account.</p>
<p>Custom iPhone application development can cost thousands or tens of thousands of dollars. But My App Creator has created a robust service with pricing so affordable that there are now no barriers to entry.</p>
<p>So what do you need to create your own app?</p>
<p>1) A news feed. Basically, this is your blog. As long as you create content regularly, it will work in your iPhone app.</p>
<p>2) A Twitter feed. There&#8217;s no reason you shouldn&#8217;t be using it to grow your network and enhance your brand. Imagine your app users being able to access your most current tweets.</p>
<p>3) Media. This can be audio or video. If you create these they can easily be placed into your app!</p>
<p>That&#8217;s it!</p>
<p>Note to readers: The link in this post will make us money because we have an affiliate relationship with Infomedia.  However, if you like this blog, and like My App Creator, then by all means, please use it.  We plan to do so ourselves soon, and when we do we will report back and let you know how it goes.</p>
Similar Posts:<ul><li>None Found</li></ul>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.appslawblog.com/ifart-mobile-creator-introduces-my-app-creator/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Apps industry on the rise, says Gartner study</title>
		<link>http://www.appslawblog.com/apps-industry-on-the-rise-says-gartner-study/</link>
		<comments>http://www.appslawblog.com/apps-industry-on-the-rise-says-gartner-study/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 02:59:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eric Seidmon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gartner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inc.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile devices]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.appslawblog.com/?p=692</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.gartner.com/technology/home.jsp">Gartner Inc.</a> <a href="http://www.gartner.com/it/page.jsp?id=1282413">reports</a> good news for the apps industry. The world&#8217;s leading information technology research and advisory company predicts that the mobile application stores will take in $6.2 billion in consumer spending<span lang="EN-US"> in 2010 and another $0.6 billion in worldwide</span>&#8230;</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.gartner.com/technology/home.jsp">Gartner Inc.</a> <a href="http://www.gartner.com/it/page.jsp?id=1282413">reports</a> good news for the apps industry. The world&#8217;s leading information technology research and advisory company predicts that the mobile application stores will take in $6.2 billion in consumer spending<span lang="EN-US"> in 2010 and another $0.6 billion in worldwide advertising revenue.</span></p>
<p><span lang="EN-US">Analysts have said that mobile app <span lang="EN-US">stores in 2010 will experience more than 4.5 billion downloads, with about 80% of those being free to end users.  Games remain the most popular apps purchased.</span></span></p>
<p><span lang="EN-US"><span lang="EN-US">As the industry grows, consumers will continue to experiment with downloads.  Apps for social networking, shopping, as well as productivity and utilities continue to grow and garner more money as smartphone mobile devices with Internet and app capabilities expand. </span></span></p>
<p><span lang="EN-US"><span lang="EN-US">Gartner says that as the market becomes more saturated with cheaper smartphones, users will become less tech-savvy and more hesitant to pay for apps.  As a result, the firm thinks  that advertising </span></span><span lang="EN-US"><span lang="EN-US">sponsors will see growth.</span></span></p>
<p><span lang="EN-US"><span lang="EN-US">By 2013, the company expects about 25% of revenues will come from paid-for apps and advertising-sponsored free apps as the industry will likely become more advertising and sponsorship based. </span></span></p>
<p><span lang="EN-US"><span lang="EN-US">App developers will need to find not just the right revenue model, but the the right platforms.  The professionals at <a href="www.appslawblog.com">appslawblog</a> can answer questions about how to get an app-based business off the ground. <a href="http://www.appslawblog.com/contact-us/">Contact them</a> through this site.<br />
</span></span></p>
Similar Posts:<ul><li>None Found</li></ul>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.appslawblog.com/apps-industry-on-the-rise-says-gartner-study/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Facebook privacy settings you should get to know</title>
		<link>http://www.appslawblog.com/facebook-privacy-settings-you-should-get-to-know/</link>
		<comments>http://www.appslawblog.com/facebook-privacy-settings-you-should-get-to-know/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 01:15:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eric Seidmon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arnstein & Lehr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-Commerce Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Misha Kerr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.appslawblog.com/?p=709</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="www.facebook.com"><img class="alignright" src="http://profy.com/wp-content/blogs.dir/1/files/2009/01/facebook-privacy-settings.png" alt="" width="323" height="166" /></a>Facebook recently modified its <a href="http://www.facebook.com/policy.php">privacy settings</a>; so should you. What may seem private may very well be public to all of cyberspace.</p>
<p>In an interview with <a href="http://www.technewsworld.com/rsstory/69158.html">e-Commerce Times</a>, <a href="http://legalnews.arnstein.com/">Arnstein &#38; Lehr</a> attorney <a href="http://legalnews.arnstein.com/misha-j-kerr/">Misha Kerr</a> made the&#8230;</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="www.facebook.com"><img class="alignright" src="http://profy.com/wp-content/blogs.dir/1/files/2009/01/facebook-privacy-settings.png" alt="" width="323" height="166" /></a>Facebook recently modified its <a href="http://www.facebook.com/policy.php">privacy settings</a>; so should you. What may seem private may very well be public to all of cyberspace.</p>
<p>In an interview with <a href="http://www.technewsworld.com/rsstory/69158.html">e-Commerce Times</a>, <a href="http://legalnews.arnstein.com/">Arnstein &amp; Lehr</a> attorney <a href="http://legalnews.arnstein.com/misha-j-kerr/">Misha Kerr</a> made the point abundantly clear that &#8220;what you think is a private page is not private, and you never know who has access to it.&#8221;</p>
<p>Privacy settings and how you use them are becoming the subject of intense litigation. Kerr represented a person who inadvertently attended a filming party for an adult website.  The young woman never signed a release for her images but ended up on the adult Web site anyway. Kerr sued on behalf of the client, claiming violation of privacy and damage to her reputation.</p>
<p>The defendant responded by showing photos the woman had posted to a social networking site which were risque, arguing that her reputation could not be damaged too seriously. Just a few changes to the woman&#8217;s privacy settings could have changed the lawsuit&#8217;s outcome.</p>
<p>Many Facebook users face a similar risk of having their private lives exposed if they opted for settings Facebook recommended in December 2009. They may not have understood to what they were were agreeing.</p>
<p>If you fall into this category, read on. If not, you should still read on unless you don&#8217;t care about your privacy. The recommended settings are somewhat unsettling.  They give Facebook the right to publicize your own Facebook page&#8217;s private information  such as your photos, status updates and items you&#8217;ve posted.</p>
<p>The Web site <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/the_3_facebook_settings_every_user_should_check_now.php">ReadWriteWeb.com</a> lists the three most important privacy settings to make sure you have set to your needs.  The first covers things you share, such as your status updates, photos, videos and other posted items; the second addresses who can see your personal information; and the third determines whether your account is accessible to search engines like <a href="www.google.com">Google</a>.</p>
<p>All three  settings and more can be modified. For step-by-step directions, visit the <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/the_3_facebook_settings_every_user_should_check_now.php">ReadWriteWeb.com link</a>.</p>
Similar Posts:<ul><li>None Found</li></ul>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.appslawblog.com/facebook-privacy-settings-you-should-get-to-know/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google China attacked, future uncertain</title>
		<link>http://www.appslawblog.com/google-china-attacked-future-uncertain/</link>
		<comments>http://www.appslawblog.com/google-china-attacked-future-uncertain/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 21:13:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eric Seidmon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chinese government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cyber attack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guardian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[human rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hydraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[network security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trojan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.appslawblog.com/?p=700</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google China has reportedly been attacked via malware from someone on the inside.  As a result, Google's future remains uncertain.  ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="www.google.com"><img class="alignright" src="http://blogoscoped.com/files/google-china-adds-maps-large.png" alt="" width="314" height="213" /></a><a href="www.google.com">Google</a> has announced that its Chinese service will no longer censor its search results, according to the British news site <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/">Guardian</a>. The decision follows recent cyber-attacks against Google and an increase in <a href="http://english.gov.cn/">Chinese government</a> controls on Internet access for its citizens.  As of now, Google is still censoring searches launched within <a href="http://www.china.org.cn/">China </a>and will talk to the government about whether it is even possible to operate its service uncensored in  China.</p>
<p>There are conflicting reports on Google&#8217;s future in that nation.  <a href="http://www.npr.org/">National Public Radio (NPR)</a> <a href="http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=122540813&amp;ps=cprs">reports</a> that Google may pull out of China altogether rather than deal with Chinese government censorship.</p>
<p>Google&#8217;s controls are not fail-proof, that much is certain.  The attacks on Google appear to be politically motivated.  They originated in China and targeted intellectual property and e-mail accounts of human rights activists. As the  <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2010/jan/18/china-google-cyber-attack">Guardian reports</a>:</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><em>&#8220;The Foreign Correspondents&#8217; Club of China said in a statement today that Gmail accounts used by journalists in at least two bureaux in Beijing had been hijacked and their emails forwarded to unknown email addresses. Last week several well-known Chinese advocates of human rights complained of the same problem.&#8221;</em></p>
<p>Although it has not been officially confirmed, the attacks targeted people with access to specific parts of Google&#8217;s networks. Those efforts may have been helped by Google&#8217;s own employees in the company&#8217;s China offices.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2010/jan/18/china-google-cyber-attack">Guardian reports</a> that the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Malware">malware</a> (malicious software) used in the attack was a modification of a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trojan_horse_(computing)">trojan</a> called <a href="http://www.symantec.com/security_response/writeup.jsp?docid=2010-011114-1830-99">Hydraq</a>.  Trojans are hidden programs whose purpose is to provide unauthorized access to a computer.</p>
<p>The malware is not that important.   Who was targeted is at the heart of the matter.  The victims allude to the attack coming from the inside because the assailants knew exactly who they were seeking.  Furthermore, some Google China employees were denied access to internal networks, some were put on leave, and some were transferred to different offices, all shortly after the incident took place.</p>
<p>Google will not comment on its business operations, so it will be interesting to see what transpires, both from legal and business perspectives.  Google will not quickly forget a security breach of this magnitude;  a company always looking to grow may need to  expand upon its security measures as well.</p>
Similar Posts:<ul><li>None Found</li></ul>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.appslawblog.com/google-china-attacked-future-uncertain/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Apps Law Blog adds contact forms for trademark and copyright registration</title>
		<link>http://www.appslawblog.com/apps-law-blog-adds-contact-forms-for-trademark-and-copyright-registration/</link>
		<comments>http://www.appslawblog.com/apps-law-blog-adds-contact-forms-for-trademark-and-copyright-registration/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 20:16:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joel Rothman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.appslawblog.com/?p=686</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignright" title="tm oc" src="http://t3.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:d8BrAIR4NyKumM:http://www.asginvestigations.com/corporate/trademark.jpg" alt="" width="132" height="163" />If you are an apps developer, marketer, or just want to be one, then sooner or later you will have questions or need assistance registering a trademark or copyright for your app.  We&#8217;re here to help!</p>
<p>Want to register a&#8230;</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignright" title="tm oc" src="http://t3.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:d8BrAIR4NyKumM:http://www.asginvestigations.com/corporate/trademark.jpg" alt="" width="132" height="163" />If you are an apps developer, marketer, or just want to be one, then sooner or later you will have questions or need assistance registering a trademark or copyright for your app.  We&#8217;re here to help!</p>
<p>Want to register a trademark?  If so, <a href="../about/trademark/" target="_blank">click here</a>.  Want to register a copyright?  We have a form for that too <a href="../about/copyright/" target="_blank">right here</a>.</p>
<p>Have other questions?  Ask them <a href="../contact-us/" target="_blank">here</a>.</p>
Similar Posts:<ul><li>None Found</li></ul>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.appslawblog.com/apps-law-blog-adds-contact-forms-for-trademark-and-copyright-registration/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
